The Art of Losing

Tags

, , , , , ,

Elizabeth Bishop
Elizabeth Bishop, 1964.

Many of you may know Elizabeth Bishop’s beautiful poem “One Art.” It’s written in a tricky verse form called a villanelle, which requires repeating certain lines multiple times in different contexts. Probably the most famous villanelle in English is Dylan Thomas’ “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night,” in which the title line and the second line are the ones repeated: “Do not go gentle into that good night / Rage, rage, against the dying of the light.”

In Bishop’s poem, the key line is this one: “The art of losing isn’t hard to master.” Using that line as a hinge, she traces all the losses of her life, from the small to the great, and in each case tells us, “the art of losing isn’t hard to master.” Car keys, people’s names, places you meant to travel – all are easily lost. And then she raises the stakes: a house, a city. But still the reassuring line comes in at the end of the stanzas like a tolling bell. “The art of losing isn’t hard to master.”

In the final stanza, she writes of life’s greatest loss, losing a loved one. And here the cracks in her false bravado finally show. She writes:

            — Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture

            I loved) I shan’t have lied. It’s evident

            the art of losing’s not too hard to master

            though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.

It’s that “Write it!” that gives it away. Losing is hard to master. In fact, it’s practically unbearable sometimes. And although it’s not an especially pleasant subject, it’s one that we should probably think about from time to time.

Four years ago this month, the first deaths in the continental U.S. from COVID-19 occurred. It doesn’t seem all that long ago, and yet it seems like an eternity. The past four years introduced us to loss on a scale we weren’t used to, and I’d have to say that as a nation we didn’t handle it all that well.

What I remember most about those early months of the pandemic was the pervading sense of dread. For the first time in my personal memory, we faced a disease that was mysterious and often fatal, and for which the usual methods of treatment didn’t seem to work. I remember the great run on ventilators, with people patching together makeshift versions out of what seemed like spare vacuum cleaner parts. And then the mania for hand sanitizer.

And after the dread came the months of deaths. Earlier generations had experienced massive nationwide pandemics before. I recall hearing my parents talk about the pervasive fear they felt before polio was brought under control. And my grandparents had vivid memories of the so-called “Spanish flu” of their younger years. But for me, who had grown up as a typical optimistic American, with the ingrained belief that throwing enough ingenuity and technology at a problem would inevitably solve it, this new situation was profoundly disturbing. Refrigerator trucks pressed into service as makeshift morgues. Nightly death counts on the evening news. Doctors and nurses in combat mode. And worst of all, the seemingly endless and random loss of life. Friends, neighbors, loved ones – hardly a family in America was left untouched by this illness.

Compounding the loss was our national response. For many people, COVID was accompanied by a stigma and a perception of politics. This attitude fostered a culture of denialism and wishful thinking, which complicated efforts to control the spread of the disease. The elected coroner of Cape Girardeau County in southeast Missouri, for example, only listed COVID as a cause of death if a family requested it, claiming that he didn’t want to offend their sensibilities. And many families said they appreciated his action.

But beyond the loss of lives, the pandemic cost us other things, maybe just as important in the long term. One thing I remember vividly from my parents’ stories about the polio epidemic was the immense sense of relief and gratitude they felt when it was announced in the 1950s that a vaccine had been developed: first the Salk injection, and later the Sabin sugar cube. That universal reaction did not happen during COVID. People who had been conditioned by demagogues in the media to “do their own research” and to reflexively distrust their government mobilized against the vaccine, promoting alternative treatments of little or no value. This breakdown in trust continues to this day. And it has spread into a wider breakdown of trust in the whole social compact. Anti-government rhetoric that would make an anarchist blush is now routine. In my home state of Missouri, it’s a powerful force in state politics. We have the peculiar situation of people in government telling us not to trust the government. That’s unsustainable in the long run, as I think we all recognize. But right now, and probably for a long time to come, a lot of Americans would not agree with the statement “We’re all in this together.”

I hope and believe that someday our social fabric will be mended. But right now it is torn. And as we all know, even after a fabric is mended you can still see the place where it tore. This loss of faith has tangible consequences. Public health experts estimate that of the roughly 1.1 million Americans to date who have died from COVID, about 200,000 of them died because they voluntarily chose not to be vaccinated after one became available. A friend of mine used to argue, only half-facetiously, that these deaths should be counted as suicides in our national statistics. There’s a deep moral cost here.

In addition to that social loss, I feel that we have lost something on a more personal level. Let me give you an example. I know some folks, a retired couple, sweet people who love their kids and their dog and fuss around in their yard, just like all of us. But they are also among the millions who have gone down the anti-vax, Ivermectin, conspiracy-thinking road, and true to form they’ve both had COVID a couple of times. And of course they’ve received the same exemplary medical treatment that I would expect if I ever had to go to the hospital, despite the fact that in my mind they’ve brought their troubles on themselves. But now when I look at them I don’t see the same eccentric but harmless people I saw before. There is a veil between us. I no longer trust their judgment or common sense, and I’m not sure whether that trust will ever come back. These smaller breaches are a mirror of the larger social disruptions I mentioned, but somehow I feel them differently, because they’re so personal.

Another loss that I think we all felt, but perhaps didn’t notice, was the inability to properly grieve those we lost during that time. Not just those lost to COVID, but those who died for other reasons but disappeared among the lockdowns and quarantines. I had a friend named Duane Dailey, who died in March 2020 at the age of 84. Duane had a long and rewarding career with the University of Missouri Extension Service, producing articles and photographs of exceptional quality, specializing in Missouri agriculture. But when he died, we were of course in the height of the lockdown, so no services were held. The funeral home in his north Missouri hometown took charge of arrangements, but with no opportunity to gather, those arrangements didn’t pan out. Ecclesiastes tells us that there is a time to mourn and a time to dance, but he doesn’t give any advice about what to do if you’ve missed your time. A death is always a shock, with someone there one day and then not there the next day, but a death without recognition seems exceptionally difficult. It was as if my friend had just been swallowed up by the earth without so much as a chance to wave good-bye.

All of this adds up to a sense of dislocation in our lives. We have begun to start dating things as “before COVID” and “after COVID” like people used to do when they would say “before the war” and “after the war.” And even in myself I feel a kind of amnesia taking hold about that first year. A while back I read Charles Finch’s book What Just Happened. Finch had the good idea of keeping a day-to-day diary of his impressions and feelings during the first year of COVID, which was also, as we remember, the year of unrest after the killing of George Floyd and the year of a chaotic and disturbing Presidential election. Finch’s daily recollections brought home to me the sense of paranoia and constant uneasiness that characterized the year. He summed up 2020 in one short sentence: “Don’t go anywhere and be afraid.”

That’s not a way to live one’s life in the long run, and I think that many of us are still in the process of climbing out of that foxhole. But how do we do it? How do we get back to something that passes for normal after such a siege?

Toward the end of George Bernard Shaw’s play Major Barbara, Barbara’s father tells her, “You have learnt something. That always feels at first as if you had lost something.” And I think now we’re in the reverse position. We’ve lost a lot. And losing feels unbearable. But we have no choice but to bear it. The question is, will we learn from it?

I have always hated to lose. When I was in the eighth grade, I took part in the annual spelling bee sponsored in Missouri by the St. Louis Globe-Democrat. I won the regional round and got to go up to St. Louis for the statewide match. The winner would get a trip to Washington, D.C., for the National Spelling Bee. There were about twenty of us kids, and we spelled and misspelled until there were only two left, myself and another eighth grader, who I think was from St. Louis. I don’t remember much about the match, to be honest. The only things I remember are the word that knocked me out – “sesquicentennial” – and the word they gave the other kid, which he spelled correctly to win the trip to Washington: “receipt.” I mean, come on. Everybody can spell “receipt.” So as you can see, losing haunts me. But you know what? I’ve never misspelled “sesquicentennial” again. There is learning in loss, if only we can see it.

I think that for the next few years we are going to be in the “picking up the pieces” phase of our society as we recover from the losses of the past half-decade, figure out what can be rescued or repaired, and what has to be left behind. We will have to learn from our losses. It doesn’t sound like easy work. But we should remember that the most beautiful mosaics are built from broken pieces.

War

Tags

, , , ,

I saw The Zone of Interest recently. It’s a grueling movie, determinedly clinical, off-putting, and not for the faint of heart. The plot is essentially a domestic drama, with the twist being that the family at the center of the drama happens to be the commandant of Auschwitz and his wife and children. Family squabbles, difficulties with servants and co-workers, tension between work life and home life, all are played out with the blank gray wall of the concentration camp as the literal backdrop of most scenes. We never actually see the horrors of the camp, but we hear them: gunfire, shouted orders, wails, the arrival of the trains. And we see how the family has trained itself to screen them out.

In that sense, one could say that Zone of Interest is a dramatization of Hannah Arendt’s “banality of evil” observation. The most horrifying thing about the movie is how ordinary, how humdrum, the people in it are. The commandant is an aspirational bureaucrat whose ambition is to become deputy director, and the way to do that is through efficiency and sucking up to his superiors. The hinge point of plot is an impending transfer, which he sees as an important rung on his career ladder and his wife sees as a threat to the happy, stable home they have built there. Sounds kinda like the plot to Meet Me in St. Louis, doesn’t it? Except that his industry is the snuffing out of lives, and their home rests on slave labor and the wealth they reap from the exterminated prisoners. The family is simultaneously horrifying and boring.

Coincidentally, I’ve been reading Suite Francaise lately, another story set during World War II. The fact that Irene Nemerovsky, the author of Suite Franciase, was one of the approximately 1.1 million people murdered at Auschwitz has lent an awful irony to my reading. I suppose the irony is always there, whether you’ve just watched a movie set in Auschwitz or not. Suite Francaise depicts the horror and confusion of the German invasion of France in 1940, and the uneasy coexistence between occupier and occupied in the year after. It was two-fifths of a planned five-book series, which was cut short by Nemerovsky’s arrest and murder.

What to make of all this besides the obvious? War is hell. People have a capacity for monstrousness that very nearly exceeds our ability to express. If such a thing is obvious, so be it. We need to be reminded of obvious things sometimes. And sometimes we need to be reminded of them over and over.

Water

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Turkey Creek, south of Columbia.

It’s been a dry couple of years in Missouri. Currently, the federal drought monitor run by a consortium of agencies, including NOAA, the USDA, and others, shows 72 percent of the state in drought conditions, ranging from “moderate” to “extreme,” with another 21 percent identified as “abnormally dry.” So 93 percent of the state is drier than it should be.

One of my most distinct childhood memories is the year that the well ran dry. When we moved onto our farm in 1965, it had a comparatively old, shallow well, that had been dug out when the house was built. A couple of years later, we had a drought summer. The water from the well, which ran into a tank in the basement, turned a yellow-brown. Then the tank stopped refilling. We were out of water.

My dad rigged up a tank and mounted it in the truck to bring water from town. But that was not a long-term solution, and as soon as my parents could get him scheduled, the well driller came out with his portable drill rig to bore us a new well. This one ran more than a hundred feet deeper than the old one, and our troubles were over.

Missouri drought conditions as of 12-31-2023.

Ever since then, I’ve been acutely aware of water. Where it comes from, how it’s used, when it’s wasted. I hate it when someone lets the tap run, or chooses a wasteful practice over a conservative one. And when I see footage of hydraulic mining, in which an entire hillside is washed away by a powerful jet of water, the affronting waste of both land and water is more than I can bear.

Industrial agriculture is a profligate consumer of water, as people in California and the Southwest are acutely aware. Bitter conflicts have already become commonplace as agricultural industrialists, other industries, residential uses, and competing governments battle over a resource that is scarce and getting scarcer, and thus more expensive. And you can’t just keep drilling deeper. Just ask the people from South Dakota to Texas who have been drawing down the Ogallala Aquifer, where the drawdown rate is reaching dangerous levels in many areas. As the old saying goes, if you’re not worried, that just means you haven’t been paying attention.

In some parts of the world, water provision has been privatized, a practice that has brought great harm to the poor. Taking something that is essential to life and turning it into a sellable commodity is a recipe for exploitation and horror. If you’re concerned about the flow of migrants from Central and South America to the U.S. border, you should be thinking about the conditions that drive them to make such extreme and life-threatening decisions.

Lately, I’ve been reading Material World, a book by Ed Conway that explores the basic materials that make up our lives, such as sand, salt, iron, and so on. A recurring theme of the book is the incredible interdependence that modern products have forced upon us. To get the little chip that powers my furnace thermostat, industries and processes on multiple continents and in countries that we would ordinarily consider antithetical to each other must cooperate in an immense web of production and commerce. We are truly living in a global world, even when that global interdependence is invisible to us. And as Conway reminds us, the rise and fall of nations and civilizations has often been the result of resource scarcity or loss.

Surely that is the case with water. Imagine the implications if the water ran out in the southwestern part of the country, not just for a year or two, but permanently, and southern California, Nevada, and Arizona returned to their natural state as near-deserts. The long trail of desperate migrants might then be heading in a different direction.

Patriotic Songs – 8

Tags

, , , , , ,

In honor of Veterans Day, which of course used to be Armistice Day until we started accumulating entire other groups of veterans who deserved to be honored for things other than World War I, I’ll spend a few words on one of our oddest patriotic songs: “Yankee Doodle.”

I think “Yankee Doodle” owes its longevity to its irresistible tune, which Wikipedia tells us dates back as far as the 15th Century. It’s hard to hear “Yankee Doodle” without wanting to break into a little jig. The 1876 painting above, which we now know as “The Spirit of ’76,” was originally titled “Yankee Doodle,” and that probably helps to explain why we associate “Yankee Doodle” with the fife.

The lyrics of “Yankee Doodle” are, to the modern ear, pretty much incomprehensible. What’s all this about feathers and macaroni? It’s a favorite subject for history trivia buffs, so you may have heard this story already. Here’s the short version:

In the 17th century, fashionable young English gentlemen often adopted an extreme style of dress and ornamentation, imitating Continental styles they had seen while on the Grand Tour. This ornamentation became referred to as “macaroni,” a term which was also applied to the young gentlemen themselves. So when Yankee Doodle sticks a feather in his cap and calls it “macaroni,” he’s doing what his transatlantic contemporaries were doing, but in a much more humble way.

In fact, the original intent of that verse was to make fun of Mr. Doodle as a rustic who doesn’t understand style. The idea that a mere feather could serve the purpose, rather than a tall powdered wig and a constellation of ruffles, was a sign of how crude and unsophisticated the colonists were. But during the Revolution those colonists did the American thing by embracing an insult and claiming it as a point of pride. Yankee Doodle’s brash and unconventional behavior became a cause for celebration, not embarrassment.

The song was played at two significant British surrenders during the Revolution, Saratoga and Yorktown, cementing it as the song of the American Revolution from then forward. And its emblematic portrayal of Americans as unsophisticated and unabashed persists to this day. The phrase “Yankee Doodle Dandy” was picked up by George M. Cohan for his song, “The Yankee Doodle Boy,” which premiered in 1904; it was picked up again in the Cohan biopic of 1942, which starred James Cagney. Watching Cagney’s memorable performance in that movie reminds us why Cagney disliked being typecast as a gangster and preferred to be thought of as a song-and-dance man.

The full version of “Yankee Doodle” runs to 16 verses and has an ironic and humorous twist for a patriotic song. In the complete version of the song, the narrator and his father visit a Revolutionary encampment and battle site “along with Captain Gooding,” where they catch a glimpse of Captain Washington. But the weapons, the masses of men, and the sights and sounds of battle frighten him so much that he scurries home and locks himself in his mother’s closet.

Book Launch

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

It’s been a whirlwind couple of days as I’ve been celebrating the launch of my new novel, LAND OF JOYS, at two of my favorite bookstores…..Skylark Bookshop in Columbia and Subterranean Books in St. Louis! We had great turnouts at both launch events. Thanks so much to these wonderful local institutions for hosting me! And if you prefer to do your shopping online, check them out on bookshop.org!

The Cemetery

Tags

, , , ,

At the Ozark Studies Conference in West Plains this weekend, I heard about the marvelous effort of local folks to restore the historic Sadie Brown Cemetery, which had fallen into disrepair.

Sadie Brown Cemetery is the historic Black cemetery of West Plains, located a couple of miles north of town, where inhabitants of the area had been given their final resting place for more than a century. Two recipients of the Bronze Star are buried there, along with many other citizens both well-known and obscure. But in recent years the cemetery had lost many of its grave markers, and these resting places were in danger of becoming lost.

But a group of local citizens took action. They joined with geophysical scientists from Missouri State University, obtained funding from the Community Foundation and other sources, and took on the job of re-identifying and re-marking the graves. The presentation at this weekend’s conference showed the remarkable use of technology such as ground-penetrating radar to locate previously unknown gravesites. Where the occupant of the grave could not be identified, the grave was marked with a simple stone and a Bible verse, such as this:

A cemetery is the most permanent of all signifiers of a community. When the post office is gone, when the school is gone, when the church is gone, the cemetery remains. Many locations across the rural United States are now known only by the name of a cemetery on a map, sitting at a seemingly random crossroads or out in the middle of a cornfield. But that cemetery contains a multitude of stories: tragedies, dramas, farces, and just the simple stories of people trying to live their lives as best they can. It was heartwarming to hear the story of people banding together and enlisting the support of local institutions to keep those stories alive. It would be wonderful if a more organized effort could be generated across rural areas to preserve and document those nearly-forgotten cemeteries. There are some organizations that have funds available for these efforts, such as the National Trust for Historic Preservation, but often what a neglected cemetery needs is energy, leadership, and guidance.

The River

Tags

, , , ,

Black River below Clearwater Dam

I grew up near a river. Most of the time, we didn’t give the river any systematic thought. It was just there, as rivers are, always good for a pleasant look as we crossed the bridge, its ripples catching the sun. A destination for my perpetually unsuccessful fishing outings, and in summer always the choice for a swimming trip or family cookout. It was (and is) a beautiful river, hardly more than a creek in some spots, with glass-clear water that trickled down, not from great springs like the Current or Meramec, but from a network of tributaries, tiny wet-weather creeks that gradually accumulated volume, filtering through the dolomite to the surface. East Fork, Middle Fork, West Fork – they all converged south of Lesterville to create the river, which then twisted south through timberland and bluffs, mostly wild land with the occasional farmhouse.

But then the river would force itself into our awareness. Any time of year, a sudden heavy rain would push it out of its banks, swelling it into the full valley. We’d stand on the overlooks and watch trees, fences, picnic tables, debris of all sorts as it washed downstream. And if the flood followed several days of rain, then the volume of water coming from the saturated valley would be enormous. The road to town would be underwater, and we’d have to take the back way out. Not that that would do much good, usually, as other creeks would be up in other directions. The best bet was to simply wait it out if you could.

And once or twice a year would be a drowning. A local kid, showing off his backflip from a rock. A tourist unfamiliar with the depth of a fishing hole. A canoer with the bad luck to get caught in a root wad. Strong swimmers would drown; novices would drown. It felt sometimes as though the river was a sentient being, and every so often it had to reassert its power.

Lately I’ve been reading The Flow: Rivers, Water and Wildness, an excellent book by the British writer Amy-Jane Beer. She is a white-water kayaker and naturalist, whose accounts of her many encounters with British rivers, springs, fens, lakes, and brooks, and the people who engage with them, range from the sweet to the harrowing to the tragic. She recounts ordinary encounters and fatal ones.

She remembers when she, as a novice kayaker, stood by helplessly while a far more experienced kayaker got stuck in a passage, with water pounding over him, a situation that could have ended in disaster if the other members of his team hadn’t acted swiftly to thread a rescue line and pluck him to safety. Beer recalls:

It’s not necessarily the speed, volume or power of a river that wins, but its relentlessness. It needs no breath, no sleep, no pause to stretch or shake. And in time, without fuss or ceremony, it will take heat from flesh, life from limb, tree from bark, rock from channel, mountain from continent. It will hollow the land. And it demands total respect.

Why the Fair?

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Poster for the Louisiana Purchase Exposition, informally known as the St. Louis World's Fair, painted by artist Alphonse Mucha.

As the release date for my new novel Land of Joys approaches, I am getting the inevitable question. Why choose the St. Louis World’s Fair for the setting of much of the action? What is it about the Fair that interests me?

The answer to this kind of question is never easy, and to be honest it shifts from day to day. Readers of my earlier books know that I am interested in major historical events, but also that I tend to come at them obliquely. Slant of Light, for example, can be called a “Civil War book,” but the war itself barely makes an appearance. A skirmish on the riverbank. But of course the war is felt everywhere, in the overwhelming sense of dread at its approach, the confusion and reordering of priorities upon its arrival, and the extremes to which people are forced during its prosecution. The war interests me, not for its own sake, but for what it reveals about people. Similarly, This Old World looks at the war’s aftermath, and The Language of Trees looks at the timber boom of the century’s end, with an eye toward how they were experienced by regular folks who are just trying to make it through the day.

The same is true for the 1904 St. Louis World’s Fair, more formally known as the Louisiana Purchase Exhibition. If you were to imagine an event that summed up the American experience at the turn of the 20th Century, you’d probably come up with something like the World’s Fair.

It was oversized and over-ambitious. It was determined to impress, and impress it did. It was a celebration of American ascendancy in technology and applied science. It was educational, with lofty-sounding conferences on all sorts of subjects, and it was a garish tourist extravaganza, with elaborate entertainment venues created to suit every taste (though the St. Louis Fair’s Pike, overall, was not as salacious as the Midway of Chicago’s Fair, ten years earlier).

Entrance to the exhibit "Creation" on the Pike, a spectacle portraying the first six days in the Book of Genesis.

It was bold, and loud, and full of self-promotion. But it also had a lining of regional envy, with the desire to outdo Chicago on everyone’s mind. For the good folks of St. Louis knew that Chicago was passing them economically, culturally, and in political power, and the Fair was an effort to reverse that perception in the wider world.

And the Fair was, let’s face it, an explicit celebration of the concept of white supremacy. A full third of the official Fair space was given over to the Philippine exhibit, through which visitors could stroll in comfortable complacency and observe the selected inhabitants of America’s first truly imperial conquest, congratulating themselves on their superiority to the “savages” that America had supposedly saved from Spain. The scientific congresses reinforced the idea of white superiority, and even the “first modern Olympics,” put together as a further slap to Chicago, had deep racial overtones. Everywhere you turned there was an affirmation of white supremacy, down to the sad figure of Geronimo selling autographed pictures to make ends meet.

Advertisement for human exhibits from the Philippine Islands at the World's Fair, St. Louis, 1904

In short, the Louisiana Purchase Exhibition demonstrated practically everything good, horrible, powerful, and revealing about America, and especially about the Midwest and St. Louis. So . . . why the Fair? Perhaps I should say, “How could I not choose the Fair?” In writing a book that tries to express a comprehensive and unflinching look at who we are as Americans, where we’ve come from, and where we’re going, and to do so in such a way that fits in with the overarching story of the first three novels, the St. Louis World’s Fair seems pretty much inescapable.

Pre-order Links!

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Pre-order links for my next novel, Land of Joys, are now up! Check them out here:

Your favorite local bookstore

Barnes and Noble

Amazon

Am I excited? Yes! I’ve got some bookstore appearances already set up and am hoping to set up more. Also intending to get some library appearances set up too, in the near future I hope. The book is set for a September 26 release.

Gordon Lightfoot

Tags

,

I was in my mid-teens when I bought this album, a rare occurrence for me as we kids didn’t have much disposable money those days and my parents reserved their gift-buying for Christmas, for the most part. Like most Americans at the time, I had heard Gordon Lightfoot’s music first through covers, the Peter, Paul, and Mary cover of “Early Morning Rain” in my case. Others probably heard the Marty Robbins cover of “Ribbon of Darkness” first. In any event, this was the album I bought, and I played it over and over again. I can safely say it changed my life.

I bought a twelve-string guitar. I adopted the soulful troubadour persona that I inhabited for a few years. I started performing in coffeehouses and open mics.

But more importantly, I came to appreciate the art of storytelling and lyricism that Gordon Lightfoot’s songs exemplified. Even a simple song like “Saturday Clothes” had a twist. And some of his greatest songs are the most mysterious. “If You Could Read My Mind” is a fantastically complex piece of thinking, packaged up as a three-minute heartbreak song.

I saw Gordon Lightfoot first at the Mississippi River Festival in Edwardsville, I think, and at least three more times over the years. The last time was in Nashville, in 2009 or 2010. His voice was pretty much shot by then, but he was a real trouper. He knew what the audience wanted, and he stood up there and delivered it, a full show, even though you could tell it was hard for him.

The first time I saw him he just had two sidemen, a bass player and a lead guitarist, and in later shows he added a drummer, and that was about it. The point of the show was not to overwhelm you with the effort, but to lay out the songs clean and clear. Often there would be a momentary hush after a song was finished as the audience took in the lyrics. Then applause after that beat. I always thought that pause was one of the greatest tributes you could give a songwriter.

People throughout the crowd would be hollering out their favorite song titles in hopes that he would sing it, and sometimes he did. What was interesting about that was that over the course of the night, somebody would holler out just about every single song in his output. The commercial hits, the obscure meditations, the throwaways. Every song had somebody who made it their favorite.

And the narrating voices, the different points of view! That was one of his great strengths. The cynical rake of “I’m Not Saying” and “For Loving Me,” the dreamy romantic of “Beautiful” and “Softly,” the tortured slave to sick love of “Sundown” — every voice was convincing. That was one of the great lessons I learned from Lightfoot, that you didn’t have to speak in the straightforward first-person singular all the time. And that was the gift that set him apart from so many other singer-songwriters of the time.

So this morning as I learn of Gordon Lightfoot’s death at the age of 84, and as I look back over his enormous catalog of songs, the only proper thing to say is “Thank you.”

By Arnielee – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7589668